A customer has deployed an IBM Security Access Manager V9.0 solution to protect web applications. After the initial authentication between the client and WebSEAL, WebSEAL can build a new Basic Authentication header and use the —b option to provide the auth enticated Security Access Manager user name (client's original identity) together with a predefined static password across the junction to the back -end server. Which configuration option will accomplish this?
How should the disk space occupied by the several large support files be reduced?
A deployment professional has configured Federated Single Sign -On using IBM Security Access Manager V9.0 with WebSEAL as point of contact. Which two things need to be configured to achieve Single Log Out (SLO) in the SAML 2.0 Federation? (Choose two.)
A deployment professional in charge of a large deployment with replicated reverse proxy instances needs to keep junctions, template files, and configuration settings in sync between the instances. How can this be done?
The IBM Security Access Manager (ISAM) V9.0 deployment professional tries to login to the LMI and discovers user "admin" no longer works, even though the correct password is also provided. The ISAM deployment professional must use "admin@local”. Questions and Answers PDF 9/24 https://www.validexamdumps.com/C2150 -609.html What ISAM application configuration change has occurred to cause this behavior?
A customer has a developed an OAuth 2.0 Client application to access resources on behalf of a user. The customer states that the OAuth client has the following two constraints: 1. The OAuth client is not capable of maintaining its credentials confidential for authentication with the authorization server. 2. The resource owner does not have a trust relationship with the client What is the suitable OAuth 2.0 grant type for the API Protection Policy if the user resource accessed by the OAuth 2.0 client is to be protected by IBM Security Access Manager V9.0?
