Which of the following statements regarding RSVP refresh reduction are true? (Choose two)
Which of the following reservation styles can be used to prevent both the primary and secondary paths from booking resources on a common link?
Which of the following statements regarding RSVP-TE is FALSE?
Click on the exhibit button below:Consider the following:- Router R2 is an ABR in OSPF Areas 0 and 1.- Router R2 advertises the aggregate prefix 10.10.10.0/24 into Area 1.- Router R1 in Area 0 generates LDP labels for FECs 10.10.102/31 and 10.10.10.4/31Router R3 in Area 1 places these FECs in its LIB, but it does not place them in its LFIB. What can you do on router R3 to make it populate these labels in its LFIB?
An LSP path is configured as follows:- Shared-explicit reservation style- Make-before-break (MBB) enabled- 500Mpbs bandwidth reserved on a 1Gbps linkWith 100Mbps of unreserved bandwidth remaining, the operator increases the LSP-path's bandwidth reservation to 900Mbps. What happens to the existing LSP?
You wish to advertise LDP labels for all local networks; which is the most effective policy statement to use?
