A tablet manufacturer offers the following options for its customers:Colour – Black, White, Silver, GoldModel – Standard, Mini, Pro -Gigabytes – 32, 64, 128, 256 -Connectivity – Wifi only, Wifi+CellularWhen considering the pairwise test technique, how many pair combinations are there to be tested?
A tablet manufacturer offers the following options for its customers:Colour – Black, White, Silver, GoldModel – Standard, Mini, Pro -Gigabytes – 32, 64, 128, 256 -Connectivity – Wifi only, Wifi+CellularWhen applying the pairwise test technique, how many TEST CASES would be needed to ensure that ALL pair combinations are tested?
The following depicts a main path through the use case, ‘Return Item’:USE CASE: Return Item -Use case ID: UC14 -Purpose: Customer selects an item for return and prints return labelActors: Customer, System -Pre-conditions: Customer has opened shopping site home pageThe following Exceptions have been defined:E1. Customer is already logged-in to account, therefore Main Menu displayed. Occurs at step M2.E2. Invalid Log-in details entered, prompt for re-try. Occurs at step M4.E3. Third invalid log-in attempt, account frozen for 24 hours and process ended. Occurs at step M4.E4. Go-Back requested. Occurs at steps M7 (to go back to ‘Main Menu’) and M9 (to go back to ‘Order History’ screen).You are to apply the Use Case test technique, where the following coverage rules have been defined in the test plan:One test case should be designed for the basic behaviour.Multiple alternate behaviours may be incorporated into a single test case provided they are mutually compatible.Nested alternate behaviours, where there are termination versus non-termination alternate behaviours within a “retry” exception behaviour, should be amalgamated into single test case.Applying these rules to the Return Item Use Case, how many test cases should be designed?
A web-based system is being developed to support the administration of tennis tournaments.The system provides advice on how much money to offer each player as their individual attendance fee. The amount depends on a COMBINATION of the following factors:Overall attendance fund (divided into five numeric ranges).Player’s current world ranking (divided into ten numeric ranges).Whether it is a local tournament for the player (i.e. YES or NO)Their relationship with the tournament sponsors (i.e. clothing, equipment, or endorsement).Their previous attendance history at this event (i.e. finalist, played, withdrew before event or withdrew during event)The new system needs to be ready for the next tournament in just a few months’ time, so testing schedules will be severely challenged.Which specification-based technique would be the BEST choice in the circumstances?
A web-based system is being developed to support the administration of tennis tournaments.The system provides advice on how much money to offer each player as their individual attendance fee. The amount depends on a COMBINATION of the following factors:Overall attendance fund (divided into five numeric ranges).Player’s current world ranking (divided into ten numeric ranges (i.e. top 10, top 20, top 30, other).Whether it is a local tournament for the player (i.e. YES or NO)Their relationship with the tournament sponsors (i.e. clothing, equipment, or endorsement).Their previous attendance history at this event (i.e. finalist, played, withdrew before event or withdrew during event)It has been noted that the attendance fee calculation does not take account of ‘last minute’ invitations that are made to replace a player who withdraws close to the tournament start date. In this case enhanced attendance fees are offered depending on whether the invitation is made within a week, a fortnight, or a month of the tournament start date.Which of the following specification-based techniques would be the BEST choice for testing that the appropriate fees are calculated for the ‘last minute’ scenario, and what type of defect is being targeted by the testing?
When would the Test Analyst’s involvement in an Agile project normally start?
